Issue №2, 2018



Corporate management and Social Responsibility in Europe (Part 2). Varieties of CSR: the experience of Great Britain and Germany

Full article

S.N. Bolshakov, Leningrad State University named after А.S. Pushkin,St. Petersburg, Russia, Doctor of Economics, Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Vice-rector, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

This article examines the crоss-national strategies for implementing the policy of corporate social responsibility. On the example of Great Britain and Germany, the problems of integrating state governance institutions into the policy of implementing public obligations and social responsibility of corporate governance are analyzed. The article analyzes the problems of choosing tools for state regulation of the corporate sphere of business in a liberal economic model, analysis and economic evaluation of these assumptions allows us to state the inevitability of distancing corporations in the UK from the European single economic model.

Keywords: corporate management, public administration, social responsibility, economic regulation, strategic management.


  1. Ahlquist J.A., C. Breunig, ‘Country clustering in comparative political economy’, Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, MPIfG Discussion Paper 5 (2009), p. 3.
  2. Apostolakou A., G. Jackson, ‘Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute?’, University of Bath, School of Management, Working Paper Series 1 (2009).p.230
  3. Beckert J. Wer zähmt den Kapitalismus’ in J. Beckert et al. (eds.), Transformation des Kapitalismus. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 2006. p. 425.
  4. Bertelsmann Stiftung (ed.), Die gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen (Gütersloh, 2005); FORSA/Gesellschaft für Sozialforschung und statistische Analysen, Corporate Social Responsibility in Deutschland (Berlin, 2005); The sample number is thirty-two (works councils), Hans-Böckler-Stiftung 2004.
  5. Bowen H. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper & Row, 1953., p. 6.
  6. Bussler C. Ergebnisse des EU-Konsultationsprozesses zu Rahmenbedingungen für die soziale Verantwortung von Unternehmen’ in A. Fonari and C. Bussler (eds.), Sozial- und Umweltstandards bei Unternehmen: Chancen und Grenzen (Munich: Digitaldruck leibi. de, 2005), p. 43.
  7. Carroll A.B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance’ // Academy of Management Review 4 (1979), 497, 500.
  8. Carroll A.B. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct’//Business & Society 38 (1999). Pp.268 - 269.
  9. Cohen J., C. Sabel, ‘Directly-deliberative polyarchy’, ELJ 3 (1997). 313
  10. Compa L. Corporate social responsibility and workers’ rights’, Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal 30 (2008).p. 1
  11. Cuesta M.Gonzalez, C. V. Martinez, ‘Fostering corporate social responsibility through public initiative: From the EU to the Spanish case’, Journal of Business Ethics 55 (2004) p.273, p.283.
  12. Discussion Paper SP III. OMC research’, EIOP special issue 1(13) (2009), p. 301.
  13. Doh J.P., T. R. Guay, ‘Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective’, Journal of Management Studies (2005). p.47.
  14. Esping-Andersen G. Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
  15. Esping-Andersen G. The Three Worlds Of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press. 1990.
  16. European Council, Lisbon European Council, 23 and 24March 2000, Presidency Conclusions, 2000.
  17. Former UK government website, quoted in Steurer (n. 41 above), p. 11.
  18. Friedman M. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits’, New York Times, 13 September 1970.
  19. Gribben C., K. Pinnington and A. Wilson, Governments as Partners: The role of the central government in developing new social partnerships. Copenhagen: The Copenhagen Centre, 2001. p. 7-10
  20. Grosser K., J. Moon, ‘Best practice reporting on gender equality in the UK: Data, drivers and reporting choices’, University of Nottingham, ICCSR Research Paper Series 35 (2006), p. 40.
  21. Hall P.A., D.W. Soskice, ‘An introduction to varieties of capitalism’ in P. A. Hall and D. W. Soskice (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 1, p.16, p.17-33
  22. Hauser-Ditz A., P. Wilke, Corporate Social Responsibility – Soziale und ökologische Verantwortung von Unternehmen. Eine Betriebsrätebefragung zu den Handlungsfeldern für Arbeitnehmervertretungen, Diskussionspapier (Hamburg, January 2005).
  23. Huijstee M.V., P. Glasbergen, ‘The practice of stakeholder dialogue between multinationals and NGOs’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (2007), 10.1002/CSR; Apostolakou and Jackson (n. 6 above).
  24. Implementing the Partnership for Growth and Jobs: Making Europe a pole of excellence on CSR, COM/2006/136 Final, Brussels, 22 March 2006
  25. Initially, the European Parliament proposed to establish such a forum, de Schutter (n. 6 above), p. 212.
  26. Kaufmann F.-X. Herausforderungen des Sozialstaates. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997/
  27. Kinderman A., T. Niechoj, ‘Does supranational coordination erode its national basis? The case of European labour market policy and German industrial relations’ in S. Kröger (ed.),
  28. Kinderman D. Why do some countries get CSR sooner, and in greater quantity, than others? The political economy of corporate responsibility and the rise of market liberalism across the OECD 1977–2007
  29. Kröger S. Soft Governance in Hard Politics: European coordination of anti-poverty policies in France and Germany (Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2008).
  30. Kröger S.The open method of coordination: Underconceptualisation, overdetermination, depoliticisation and beyond’ in S. Kröger (ed.), ‘What we have learnt: Advances, pitfalls and remaining questions in OMC research’, EIOP special issue 13 (2009). p.1.
  31. Liebert U. The politics for a Social Europe and the Lisbon process’ in Lars Magnussion and Bo Strath (eds.). European Solidarities: Tensions and Contentions of a Concept (Frankfurt aM: Peter Lang, 2007. p. 267
  32. Maab F., R. Clemens Corporate Citizenship. Das Unternehmen als guter Bürger’ in Institut für Mittelstandsforschung Bonn (ed.), Jahrbuch zur Mittelstandsforschung 2 (2002).
  33. McWilliams A., D. Siegel, ‘Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective’, Academy of Management Review 26 (2001), 117.
  34. Mitchell R.K., B.R. Agle, D. J.Wood, ‘Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts’, Academy of Management Review 22 (1997).p. 853.
  35. Moon J. Government as a driver of corporate social responsibility’, University of Nottingham, ICCSR Research Paper Series 20 (2004); L. Albareda, J. M. Lozana and T. Ysa, ‘Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe’, Journal of Business Ethics 74 (2007), 391.
  36. Moon J., D. Vogel Corporate social responsibility, government, and civil society’ in A. Crane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2004. p. 303;
  37. Mutz G., J. Egbringhoff, Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen. Die Rolle der Arbeitnehmervertretung. Berlin-Munich: Hand-Böckler-Stiftung. 2006.
  38. Neal A.C. Corporate social responsibility: Governance gain or laissez-faire figleaf? // Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 29 (2008), 1.
  39. Offe C. The European model of “social” capitalism: Can it survive European integration? // Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (2003), 437.
  40. Scharpf F. Weshalb die EU nicht zur sozialen Marktwirtschaft werden kann’, Zeitschrift für Staats- und Europawissenschaaften 7 (2009), 419.
  41. Schutter de O. Corporate social responsibility European style’, European Law Journal 14 (2008), p.203, 222-223
  42. Scott S. Corporate social responsibility and the fetter of profitability’, Social Responsibility Journal 3. 2007. pp.31
  43. Snyder F. Soft law and institutional practice in the European Community’ in S. Martin (ed.), The Construction of Europe: Essays in honour of Emile Noel (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993), p. 198.
  44. Steurer R. The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: characterizing public policies on CSR in Europe’, Policy Sci (2009), published online 9 May 2009, 7.
  45. Streeck W. Korporatismus in Deutschland. Zwischen Nationalstaat und Europäischer Union. Frankfurt am Main: Campus. 1999
  46. Trebek K. Exploring the responsiveness of companies: corporate social responsibility to stakeholders’, Social Responsibility Journal 4 (2008), 349.
  47. Trubek D., L. Trubek Hard and soft law in the construction of Social Europe: The open method of coordination’, ELJ 11 (2005). 343.
  48. Untitled response to the Commission Green Paper. 2001. ).
  49. Ward H. Legal issues in corporate citizenship’// Report of the International Institute for Environment and Development (2003),
  50. Wicks M. Who held responsibilities for CSR issues, 14 March 2006, cited in Neal (n. 20 above), p. 472.
  51. Williams C.F., R. V. Aguilera Corporate social responsibility in a comparative perspective’ in A. Crane et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 452, 456.

For citation: Bolshakov S. N. Corporate management and Social Responsibility in Europe (Part 2). Varieties of CSR: the experience of Great Britain and Germany // Corporate governance and innovative economic development of the North: Bulletin of the Research Center of Corporate Law, Management and Venture Capital of Syktyvkar State University. 2018. № 2. P. 60-70.