Latest Issue



Finding the potential contribution of the fuel and energy sectors to increase the energy efficiency of the economy

DOI: 10.34130/2070-4992-2019-4-92-98

Full article 

Sadov S. L. – Doctor of Economics, Leading Re-searcher, Institute of Socio-Economic and Energy Problems of the North, Komi Scientific Center, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar, Russia; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

This article is devoted to the method of determining the potential contribution of the fuel and energy complex (FEC) sectors to improving the energy efficiency of the region or country’s economy. Knowing them will help in developing the main directions and mechanisms for improving energy efficiency. Method is based on the analytical hierarchy process, which requires structuring the task – constructing in this case a full three-level hierarchy of the goal, factors influencing it and FEC branches. At the lower level of the hierarchy, the fuel and energy complex is represented by six enlarged sectors, the second is formed by the six most significant factors, and the first is the goal – improving the energy efficiency of the economy. Initial data is expert estimates of pairwise comparisons of both the significance of branches for each of the se-lected factors and the significance of factors for the main goal – improving energy efficiency.
The analytical hierarchy process makes relatively soft requirements for the initial data – the absence of transitivity violations for pairwise comparisons and compliance with restrictions on the values of consistency relations for such com-parisons matrices. The article first proposed a procedure for generating initial data with good consistency and without violating transitivity. It ensures the reliability of the results obtained by the method of analysis of hierarchies, is quite sim-ple and suitable for work as a single expert or the whole group.
Author's expert estimates for the Komi Republic economy are presented. Based on them, the expected contribution of the five integrated FEC sectors to the potential in energy efficiency increasing of the region’s economy was obtained. It is interesting that the contribution of non-traditional energy sources has a potential almost equal to the contribution of some traditional sectors of the FEC – despite the fact that now their proportion in energy production is very small. The results can be useful in concretizing the main directions of the regional energy policy in order to determine ways to im-prove energy efficiency.

Keywords: fuel and energy complex, energy efficiency of the economy, contribution of the energy sectors, analytical hierarchy process, consistency of input information.


  1. Shhelokov Ja. M. Energetika Rossii: voprosy jenergojeffektivnosti i politiki [Russian Energy: Energy Efficiency and Policy Issues]. Energosberezhenie [Energy saving], 2017, no. 1, pp. 28–33 (In Russian).
  2. Lebedev Ju. A., Pel'chenkov M. V. Analiz programm stimulirovanija i normirovanija jenergojeffektivnosti: rossijskij i zarubezhnyj opyt [Analysis of incentive programs and rationing energy efficiency: Russian and foreign experience]. Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-issledovatel'skij zhurnal [International Research Journal], 2017, no. 11(65), pp. 171–176.
  3. Zhigalov V. M., Pahomova N. V. Sovremennaja sistema strategicheskogo planirovanija jenergosberezhenija i povyshenija jenergojeffektivnosti v Rossii v kontekste novoj klimaticheskoj politiki [The modern system of strategic planning for energy conservation and energy efficiency in Russia in the context of the new climate policy]. Problemy sovremennoj ekonomiki [Problems of the modern economy], 2015, no. 3, pp. 62–72.
  4. Energetika dlja zavtrashnego mira. Dejstvovat' sejchas (Zakljuchenie Vsemirnogo jenergeticheskogo Soveta 2000 g.) [Energy for tomorrow's world. Act now (World Energy Council 2000)]. Elektricheskie stancii [Power stations], 2005, no. 2, pp. 67–70.
  5. Sadov S. L. Opredelenie znachimosti vidov regulirovanija dlja povyshenija jenergojeffektivnosti v severnyh regionah [Determination of the importance of regulation to improve energy efficiency in the northern regions]. Corporate Governance and Innovative Development of the North Economy: Bulletin of the Research Center for Corporate Law, Management and Venture Investment of Syktyvkar State University, 2018, no. 4, pp. 47–52.                                    
  6. Saati T. Prinjatie reshenij. Metod analiza ierarhij. Per. s angl. R.G. Vachnadze [Making decisions. Analytical Hierarchy Process. Trans. from English by R.G. Vachnadze]. Moscow: Radio i svjaz' [Radio and communication]. 1993. 278 pp.
  7. Zajchenko I. M., Gutman S. S. Primenenie metoda analiza ierarhij dlja vybora strategicheskogo prioriteta jenergetich-eskogo razvitija rajonov Krajnego Severa [Application of the Analitical Hierarchy Process to select the strategic priority of energy development in the Far North]. Vestnik Zabajkal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Transbaikal State University], 2017, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 114–123.
  8. Locatelli, Giorgio; Mancini, Mauro, 2012. A framework for the selection of the right nuclear power plant. Interna-tional Journal of Production Research. 50 (17): pp. 4753–4766. DOI:10.1080/00207543.2012.657965.
  9. Saracoglu, B.O., 2013. Selecting industrial investment locations in master plans of countries. European Journal of In-dustrial Engineering. 7 (4): pp. 416–441. DOI:10.1504/EJIE.2013.055016.
  10. Kuz'kin A.A. Metodika obespechenija ustojchivosti strategii razvitija informacionnyh tehnologij v organizacii [Method-ology for the sustainability ensuring of the development strategy of information technology in the organization]. Trudy SPIIRAN [Proceedings of SPIIRAS], 2014, Issue 6(37), pp. 95–115.
  11. Thomas L. Saaty and L.G. Vargas, 2001. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Pro-cess. Boston: Kluwer Academic, pp. 345. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6.
  12. Saaty, Thomas L, 2008. "Relative Measurement and its Generalization in Decision Making: Why Pairwise Compari-sons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors – The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process". Re-view of the Royal Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences, Series A: Mathematics (RACSAM). 102 (2), pp. 251–318. DOI:10.1007/bf03191825.
  13. Zaharov V.P. Energosberezhenie kak faktor razvitija regionov [Energy saving as a factor in the development of re-gions]. Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie [Management consulting], 2015, no. 9, pp. 130–139.
  14. Saaty, Thomas L., 2009. Mathematical Principles of Decision Making: Comprehensive coverage of the AHP, its suc-cessor the ANP, and further developments of their underlying concepts. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications.
  15. Saaty, Thomas L., 2013. On the Measurement of Intangibles. A Principal Eigenvector Approach to Relative Measure-ment Derived from Paired Comparisons. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 60(2): pp. 192–208. DOI: 10.1090/noti944.

For citation: Sadov S. L. Finding the potential contribution of the fuel and energy sectors to increase the en-ergy efficiency of the economy // Corporate governance and innovative economic development of the North: Bulletin of the Research Center of Corporate Law, Management and Venture Capital of Syktyvkar State Universi-ty. 2019. No. 4. Рр. 92–98. DOI: 10.34130/2070-4992-2019-4-92-98.