Issue №1, 2017

LOGIN      REGISTER

          

An innovative approach to the development of tools diagnostic parameters of administrative control business in the region

An innovative approach to the development of tools diagnostic parameters of administrative control business in the region

 

R.I. Malikov, Ufa State Petroleum Technological University (Ufa,Russia)

K.E. Grishin, Ufa State Petroleum Technological University (Ufa, Russia)

Full article 

The article discusses the theoretical issues of formation of the administrative regulation of business entities mechanisms. Settle innovative approaches and tools proposed application design and development of the business environment that could have a stimulating effect on the growth of business and investment activity in the Russian regions and municipalities. It is proved that the regional disparities in terms of doing business in the same formal institutional space is due to the specific properties of the spatial configuration of the regional institutional business environment. The conclusion is that one of the key performance indicators of the institutional configuration of the business environment is an indicator of administrative pressure on business entities. It was determined that the system of administrative regulation of business seems appropriate to identify two types of targeting government structures to business entities, differentiated by the nature of the impact of the economic activity of business structures - the administrative burden and administrative assistance. It is suggested that, in practice, in a high level of cost of costs for execution of the totality of the administrative regulatory requirements as well as sanctions for violations of these requirements formed the preconditions for the development of institutions of informal interaction of business structures with the supervisory bodies, in which businesses try to minimize the costs associated with the implementation of formal administrative requirements, rules and regulations, by personal arrangements. A mathematical model for evaluating informal interaction of businesses with individual officials of regulatory agencies, which allows to determine the range of economic agents benefit from avoiding the performance of administrative norms, requirements and rules. The conclusion is that the economic basis of reproduction of informal relations is unreasonably high level of costs of business entities for execution of formal administrative requirements, rules and regulations that lead to mutual benefits for a number of entrepreneurs and of the bureaucratic apparatus of various schemes of informal interaction

Keywords: administrative regulation, the institutional configuration of the regional business environment, business entities, business, administrative costs, informal interaction, the administrative burden, the business environment, power structures, control and surveillance activities, excessive administrative requirements formal

References

  1. V., HarisovV.I. Sovershenstvovanie motivacionnogo kompleksa dejstvij vlasti po povysheniju konkurentnogo potenciala regional'nogo predprinimatel'stva [Improvement of the motivational complex of government action to improve the competitive potential of regional business] //Jekonomikaiupravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskijzhurnal - Economy and management: scientific-practical journal, 2015, no.5(127), pp. 46-51.
  2. Asaul A.N., Vojnarenko M.P., Erofeev P.U. Organizacijapredprinimatel'skojdejatel'nostiUchebnik [Organization of business].- Sankt Reterburg, «Gumanistika», 2004.448 p.
  3. Grishin K.E, Arapov V.V. Instrumentarijvyjavlenija «tochekrosta» predprinimatel'stva v regione [Toolkit to identify "points of growth" of entrepreneurship in the region]//Jekonomikaregiona, 2013,no.4, pp. 150-156.
  4. N ,Malikov R.I, Grishin K.E. Institucional'najakonfiguracijaregional'nojdelovojsredy: parametryproektirovanija [The institutional configuration of the regional business environment: design parameters]//Voprosyjekonomiki,2014, no.11, pp.83-94.
  5. Mau V.A., Zhavoronkov S.V., Chernyj D.S., Janovskij K.E. Deregulirovanie rossijskoj jekonomiki [Deregulation of Russian economy]. Institut jekonomiki perehodnogo perioda, Nauchnyetrudy. no. 32R.2001.70 p.
  6. Pavlov K.V.Napravlenija I formy gosudarstvennoj podderzhki razvitija malogo biznesa v regione (na primere Belgorodskoj oblasti) [Directions and forms of state support of small business development in the region (on the example of the Belgorod region)]//Regional'najajekonomika: teorijaipraktika, 2011, no.25, pp.2-10.
  7. Polishhuk L. I. Necelevoe ispol'zovanie institutov: prichinyisledstvija [Misuse of Institutions: Causes and Consequences] // Voprosyjekonomiki, 2008, no.8. pp. 28-44.
  8. Solodilova N.Z., Malikov R.I., Grishin K.E. Vlijanie administrativnogo regulirovanij anajeffektivnost' predprinimatel'skojdejatel'nosti v regione [The impact of administrative regulation on the efficiency of business activities in the region] //Jekonomika regiona,2016, T.12. no.  4, pp. 1001-1013.
  9. Solodilova N.Z., Malikov R.I., Grishin K.E. Potencialrazvitijaifaktoryogranichenijaregional'nojdelovojsredy [Potential factors limiting development and the regional business environment]//Jekonomika regiona,2015, no. 2,  137-148.
  10. Solodilova N.Z., Malikov R.I., Grishin K.E. Prognozirovanieinvesticionnogopotencialapredprinimatel'stva v regione [Business Forecasting investment potential in the region]//Obshhestvoijekonomika: Nauchno-prakticheskijzhurnal, 2016,  3, pp.79-95.
  11. Frolov D.P. Metodologicheskijinstitucionalizm 2.0: otinstitutov k institucional'nymkonfiguracijam [Methodological institutionalism 2.0 : from institutions to institutional configurations]//Voprosyjekonomiki, 2016, no.7, pp. 147-160.
  12. Chetverikova I.V.Liberal'nye reformyu golovnogo zakonodatel'stva v sfere jekonomicheskoj dejatel'nosti 2009-2012 gg. isudebnajapraktika [The liberal reforms of the criminal legislation in the sphere of economic activity 2009-2012. and Litigation]//Voprosyjekonomiki, 2016, no.6, pp.91-115.
  13. Davis, L. E., North D.C. Institutional Change and American Economic Growth Cambridge. 1971. 803 р.
  14. Hellman J.S., Kaufmann D.P. Confronting the Challenge of State Capture in Transition Economies. Finance and Development (A quarterly magazine of the IMF). 2001.Vol. 38. no. 3, pp.1-9.
  15. Frye T.M., Shleifer A.I. The invisible hand and the grabbing hand. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings. 1997. vol. 87, no. 2, 354-358.
  16. Weingast B.R. The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market Preserving Federalism and Economic Development. Law, Economic and Organization, vol.11, no.1, pp. 3-31.
  17. Williamson O.E. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead.Journal of Economic Literature. vol.38 (3), pp. 595-613.

For citation: Malikov R.I, Grishin K.E. An innovative approach to the development of tools diagnostic parameters of administrative control business in the region // Corporate governance and innovative economic development of the North: Bulletin of the Research Center of  Corporate Law, Management and Venture Capital of Syktyvkar State University. 2017. № 1. P. 92-105.